Luxury skiing

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
34 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Luxury skiing

snoloco
Although certain resorts are becoming like the Titanic (massive class stratification), some are much worse than others.  Park City looks pretty bad in that respect because you can pay to cut the lift lines.  I'm sure there are others out there that are similar.  I'd just not go to those mountains.  Stowe gets the reputation of having lots of class stratification, but really if you can afford a lift ticket, you're going to get pretty much the same skiing experience regardless of wealth, and skiing is what really matters.  All the extra trills and frills are there if you want them, but if not, just get back on the lift, ski, and ignore them.

Now I'll explain my view on lodges/base facilities.  Lodge and lodging are two different things.  Anyone skiing at a mountain can go in the lodge.  For many mountains, having a fancy lodge (like Mountain Creek's Red Tail Lodge or Stowe's Spruce Peak Lodge) shows that the resort cares about the guest experience for all guests.  A lodge should be a prerequisite to lodging.  Therefore, if I was running a ski resort, I'd be building a new base lodge/cafeteria before I build a luxury slopeside hotel.  That shows that the resort cares about all guests.  Building a luxury hotel while you have a lodge that hasn't been renovated in 30 years, or is way too small for the crowds shows that a resort only cares about those who can afford the hotel and not all that can afford to ski there in any means.
I've lived in New York my entire life.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Luxury skiing

nepa
In reply to this post by PeeTex
PeeTex wrote
That too is a fallacy. With current returns you would need to save 40k/yr to be able to retire at a reasonable age and have enough funds to cover considering health care costs. Kids who don't start out earning 6 figures and debt free don't stand a chance.
I guess it really depends on the lifestyle you want to lead in retirement.  To be honest, it feels like Retirement Planning is being misrepresented by the Financial Services sector.  We are being brainwashed into constant consumption. Constant consumption reinforces the assumption that you'll need a mountain of money before you can retire.  Obviously, this works very well for the Financial Services industry business model.  IMO: If you manage expenses well, and consciously consume less, your retirement dream can be realized with a much smaller sum in your account.

Of course, if you are trying to manage a low expense retirement plan, the "Luxury Skiing" option is off the table.  That said, luxury is very subjective.  I personally find huts and yurts to be very luxurious... in comparison to a tent.

I agree Healthcare is the wildcard.  In our current environment, if you are not healthy, your dream is dead.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Luxury skiing

St. Jerry
My son and I did the ski with Lindsey & Johnny weekend at Vail last winter.  It was cool and my son thought Johnny (Mosley) was a true "ski dude".  Lindsey gave some good tips.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Luxury skiing

raisingarizona
In reply to this post by Marcski
Marcski wrote
I like to get away from people when I am in the mountains skiing. This, seems to be the antithesis of what I desire and look for when skiing.
Yes. Yes. Yes.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Luxury skiing

raisingarizona
In reply to this post by Benny Profane
Benny Profane wrote
There is no other industry that illustrates the widening of the rich and poor in this country more than skiing. It's as though they could care less about anybody with an income below six figures, which, you know, may be the best route for them. they aren't dumb, and all invest heavily in marketing research. Look at retail ticket prices. Window prices in Colorado are almost all over 100. Copper was 135 last year. Copper. Ten to twenty years from now, this is going to be a very different country, after most of the Boomers are dead or drooling into cups, and the only people who have anything are maybe 5-10% of the population. You know, the only kids who could afford to go to college and emerge debt free, to start.
 I wonder though, is it the industry not caring to get middle class family's skiing or is it that middle class people just aren't interested enough to make it a priority?

Something that sort of irks me a little is the fact that ski resorts mostly are ran on public lands but then make the product so expensive it's only available for the wealthy.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Luxury skiing

raisingarizona
In reply to this post by lolkl
Wow, I would love to know what a 29 dollar grilled cheese sandwich tastes like. It must be incredible.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Luxury skiing

Jon951
Alta all day long...who the heck needs any foo foo crap? I heard from a friend a few weeks back about the non-premier lot parking fees at some of the CO resorts. Really? Totally goes against my grain. It would be hard for me to patronize any place like this. Combo of money I wouldn't want to part with and most of all the principle governing this.

One of my fav moments ever was watching the valet in the drop off area at Deer Valley give my friend living in PC and working there at the time, the awkward eye when we rolled up in his beater Suby. Guess my friend wanted my sons and I to get a good laugh.

Snowbasin used to be nice and rustic before the 2002 Olympics..the last time I was there the caf served food on china. Bummer this place made the transition...however, terrain is still nice.
"Feets fail me not"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Luxury skiing

TomCat
In reply to this post by raisingarizona
raisingarizona wrote
 I wonder though, is it the industry not caring to get middle class family's skiing or is it that middle class people just aren't interested enough to make it a priority?

Something that sort of irks me a little is the fact that ski resorts mostly are ran on public lands but then make the product so expensive it's only available for the wealthy.
I think one of the problems is that snowmaking and grooming are expensive and the hills that haven't made the big investment seem to struggle to survive. There are exceptions like Platty and MRG, but not many. Those that make the big investment need to charge a lot to re-coop it - but they seem to be thriving.

The overall cost to ski 2-3 weekends a year is really high when you include lodging, meals, rentals, lessons then then lift tickets. Even if the ticket price was reduced 25% it is still a very expensive weekend.  For someone making plans now for a weekend, I think they rather pay a bit more and go somewhere that will likely have nice conditions.

No doubt the middle class is being priced out which may be a long term problem for the industry.

tom
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Luxury skiing

JasonWx
In reply to this post by Jon951
A lot of these foo foo places offer discounted lift tickets, every now and then it's fun to be pampered. The caf food at Deer Valley and Snowbasin are around the same price as the slop served at WF and Gore. But the quality is miles apart. The bathrooms at Snowbasin are worth the trip.
"Peace and Love"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Luxury skiing

Harvey
Administrator
In reply to this post by TomCat
TomCat wrote
I think one of the problems is that snowmaking and grooming are expensive and the hills that haven't made the big investment seem to struggle to survive. There are exceptions like Platty and MRG, but not many. Those that make the big investment need to charge a lot to re-coop it - but they seem to be thriving.
IMO Platty and MRG aren't really good examples.

Mad is subsidized by the Coop. It seems to me that, for the time being, they can suffer some really bad snow years and survive. As long as the member remains so passionate.

Platty is working extremely hard to upgrade snowmaking, spending what they can in years when they make a small profit. They look for solid value in used equipment.  Still I hear people here give them a hard time about ticket and pass prices.  This is why Laz says that $20 powder hounds aren't the solution. He needs those, like Marcski, who value the experience and see the value in a $59 ticket or $680 pass for the experience.
"You just need to go at that shit wide open, hang on, and own it." —Camp
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Luxury skiing

x10003q
We have been having these types of discussions since before the internet became a way to discuss skiing.

In the early 1980s Okemo had mostly pomas with weak snowmaking. During the 1981-82 season Okemo drew 86,000 skiers with an $18 ticket. The Muellers bought it during the summer of 1982, and after adding some chairs and boosting the snowmaking they drew 320,000 (about a $30 ticket) during the 1986-87 season. They added what some, at the time, considered luxuries. This is the accepted way to try and make money at a ski area. Sometimes we forget that  the object of 99% of all ski areas is to make money.

When my parents booked  ski weekends for our family during the 1970s, we mostly went to Mt Snow and Killington with occasional late season visits to Okemo (all those pomas made for a cheap lift ticket). The reason was Mt Snow and Killington had the most reliable snowmaking. Places like Stratton had Sugarbush had marginal snowmaking. Gore was not even on the radar (that has not changed for the NY metro area).

If ski areas figure out new ways to extract money and provide what some of us would consider ridiculous services, who can fault them? There are still many reasonably affordable places to ski, including the so called luxury places like Stratton.

Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Luxury skiing

100dayseasonorbust
Banned User
In reply to this post by Harvey
Why not just charge a premium price for powder days?  The people looking for it aren't going to be concerned with cost.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Luxury skiing

Benny Profane
In reply to this post by Jon951
Jon951 wrote
Alta all day long...who the heck needs any foo foo crap? I heard from a friend a few weeks back about the non-premier lot parking fees at some of the CO resorts. Really? Totally goes against my grain. It would be hard for me to patronize any place like this. Combo of money I wouldn't want to part with and most of all the principle governing this.

One of my fav moments ever was watching the valet in the drop off area at Deer Valley give my friend living in PC and working there at the time, the awkward eye when we rolled up in his beater Suby. Guess my friend wanted my sons and I to get a good laugh.

Snowbasin used to be nice and rustic before the 2002 Olympics..the last time I was there the caf served food on china. Bummer this place made the transition...however, terrain is still nice.

Ha. Funny you bring up Snowbasin. Had the pleasure of experiencing it just before the Olympic transition, during a three day powder dump. After all this time, the finest powder storm I have ever experienced. I remember a somewhat grizzled patrol guy telling me that he really did not want this treasure known to the world, thank you. Just like an older transplant skier at Powder up the road on the back of the cat a few days later.
funny like a clown
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Luxury skiing

witch hobble
Unless you are using it as a necessary form of transportation, any type of skiing qualifies as "luxury".  It's just a matter of degree.  If you have the time, $, health, skills, etc to participate in the sport, it's all milk and honey, so try to enjoy it.

12