raisingarizona wrote
snoloco wrote
I also don't see how they can charge for this experience unless they have a lift. If they're using a rope tow, then they can charge for use of it, but if it's on public land, they can't restrict people from hiking up if they don't pay.
Why would they need to charge people for hiking/skinning up?
The last time I took my kid to any of the many city parks that we have here in Flagstaff I didn't pay to let her use the jungle gym.
Because there would barely be any money to keep the place going.
City parks are maintained with tax dollars because they benefit the majority of the population of the city. Anyone can go to the park. Only skiers who are fit enough to hike up can go to this ski area, and because this "park" is so much bigger, it will cost so much more to maintain. Costs more and fewer people benefit from taxpayer funding than a normal city park.
I've lived in New York my entire life.