Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

classic Classic list List threaded Threaded
22 messages Options
12
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

Benny Profane
http://travel.nytimes.com/2013/01/20/travel/has-snowboarding-lost-its-edge.html?hpw&_r=0

Somehow, in trying to find the cause for less snowboarders out there, the writer of the article (who sounds like he may have only tried it once or twice) forgot about the worst recession since the thirties (which I think we're still halfway in).

One stat that shocked me - people who ski barely ski. Only an average of 5.5 days a year.
funny like a clown
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

DackerDan
He did fail to mention the recession but he did use skier visits as a comparison which apparently have remained flat during the recession according to the article. If this is the case at least the conclusion that boarding has lost some interest when compared to skiing is valid. However I think the comment from Kapuscinski should be really concerning.

In general I think the trend is for more back/side country adventure which is harder to do on a board than on skis. I bet you will find that if you combine the market for telemark and AT that is where the growth is and I would also bet that the AT and telemark numbers get added to the skier visits versus the boarder visits so you would not see a decline in alpine only.
I have found no numbers to support this, but lots of articles on the "boom" in BC and conversations with shop owners and retailers.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

tjf1967
younger kids now a days are just as apt to get a pair of twin tips as they are a snowboard.  I think that the where there numbers went.    Its all good.



Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

Benny Profane
In reply to this post by DackerDan
DackerDan wrote
In general I think the trend is for more back/side country adventure which is harder to do on a board than on skis.

Well, for me, I was one of the original old guys who learned to board in '93, and, I thought it would be my powder tool, since I didn't see much deep powder outside of a few days, if i was lucky, on a western trip to get that good at it. But, then they developed fat skis, and I never looked back.Try traversing a western bowl on a board. There are many places on western mountains that you simply cannot get to on a board. Hell, even Gore is a pain with all of the flats.
 Haven't been on a board in maybe eight years - i don't get enough days on skis to be bored enough.
funny like a clown
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

K man



But, then they developed fat skis, and I never looked back.


I know a few people who wnet to a snowboard because they were getting bored with skiing, but when shaped and fat skis came out they came back.
Avitar=Left Gully, Tuckerman Ravine
No Fat Chicks, Just Fat Skis
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

witch hobble
In reply to this post by Benny Profane
Isn't that liberal rag just an echo chamber for the latte-sipping, masters degree having, Volvo driving, climate change believers?

Snowboarding has been losing its edge, for a number of reasons, for a while now.  Its rapid growth period paralleled the tech boom.  It got too popular, nobody does it anymore....or something like that.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

DackerDan
witch hobble wrote
Isn't that liberal rag just an echo chamber for the latte-sipping, masters degree having, Volvo driving, climate change believers?

Snowboarding has been losing its edge, for a number of reasons, for a while now.  Its rapid growth period paralleled the tech boom.  It got too popular, nobody does it anymore....or something like that.
So are you saying that if Apple started making the iBoard5 it would change the market?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

witch hobble
DackerDan wrote

So are you saying that if Apple started making the iBoard5 it would change the market?
It might need a killer app or two to start driving the market again.  Maybe some synergy or a seamless interface or some other buzzword might help too.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

Harvey
Administrator
In reply to this post by Benny Profane
Benny Profane wrote
One stat that shocked me - people who ski barely ski. Only an average of 5.5 days a year.
This is why "we" (NYS Forum Members) are not a good proxy for the industry.  Assuming that Plattekill is popular because some of us love it... doesn't mean much.  Where do those 5.5 days get spent?

Killington, Hunter...? Probably not Plattekill.

Sorry for the drift, thanks for the article Benny.
"You just need to go at that shit wide open, hang on, and own it." —Camp
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

sudsnbumps
Look at the Ski Magazine Top Resorts...there are your 5.5ers
Proud to call Gore My Home Mountain
Covid stole what would have been my longest season ever!
I'll be back
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

I:)skiing
Definitely believe the 5.5.    Most skiers I talk to do one east trip for two days and one long weekend out west.    



As for snow boarding.....it was cool when no one did it.   Now that 14 yo girls and 6 yr olds are doing it, twins and fats are the new cool.    That's what I see.     Tattoos will be out of style soon enough too.    More women are getting them....which is cool I guess.   But what rebel thinks that copying mom is rebelous?
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

ADKarver
As a kid skiing in the eighties, snowboarders were the anti ski establishment crowd...the ones who did not want to wear uncomfortable boots...wear expensive CB Sports skiwear...compete in alpine race events....

In my mind, twin tips are today's snowboards.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

skimore
ADKarver wrote
As a kid skiing in the eighties, snowboarders were the anti ski establishment crowd...the ones who did not want to wear uncomfortable boots...wear expensive CB Sports skiwear...compete in alpine race events....

In my mind, twin tips are today's snowboards.
so pretty much all powder skis
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

witch hobble
Snowboarding captured the lite anti-establishment zeitgeist of the '90s pretty well.  Along with grunge taking on heavy metal power ballads, microbrews vs. megabrewed pilseners, start up tech firms vs. the Dow Jones Industrial Average, independent cinema vs. big studio productions.

The core of the sport is still there, and it has evolved to include toddlers and geezers who ride.  Some converts have switched over (or back) to skiing.  But there is a large segment that might have jumped on the bandwagon back in the day who have found other things to spend money and time on, and self identify with.  Probably around the same time they decided to let their tongue-ring hole close up.

And in the mean time, the core skiers ski around with what are basically two skinny snowboards attached to their boots (hopefully not while bashing snowboarding!)
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

JasonWx
i think snowboarding is taking hit because of the twin tip trick ski..
"Peace and Love"
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

70s Gore Kid
This post was updated on .
CONTENTS DELETED
The author has deleted this message.
Syracuse, NY
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

ScottyJack
who cares.  
I ride with Crazy Horse!
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

campgottagopee
ScottyJack wrote
who cares.
WORD
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

witch hobble
In reply to this post by ScottyJack
ScottyJack wrote
who cares.
As long as I'm replaying the 90s for us all-

Message: I care.
Reply | Threaded
Open this post in threaded view
|

Re: Well, this is interesting (NYT article)

TomCat
In reply to this post by JasonWx
JasonWx wrote
i think snowboarding is taking hit because of the twin tip trick ski..
I think it's because every time gore opens a new peak, there is a long traverse to access it.

Tom

12