louie.mirags wrote
The question that has turned into a left vs right issue(ignoring science) is whether or not we are greatly influencing it or not.
It's not a political issue, It's a scientific issue. The part of it that is political is weather or not we choose to do anything about it.
evantful wrote
The overall answer is that there has been one virtually unregulated variable in all of this and thats the human population and its general output.
There could be more to it than that, but Human output is huge at this point. The truth of the matter is that we all emit some small level of carbon monoxide when we breathe. When this earth was created or evolved or whatever you want to believe, it was not designed to handle the massive quantities of carbon output that we throw at it every day. Even natural phenomenon such as burning, or forest fires emits carbon. But a certain amount of carbon activity can easily be handled by our planet because plants absorb it and turn it back into oxygen.
So, one theory is that if we could significantly reduce our carbon output, the earth could theoretically over time recover and return to normal, but it would take some work. There may be more to it than that, I'm not an environmental scientist, but that's one theory I've heard.
I'll take boilerplate ice over wet snow any day