I don't understand that - ORDA has invested a lot in both Gore and Bell.
Don't ski the trees, ski the spaces between the trees.
|
New York State (not ORDA) has invested a lot of money in Gore and Bell, ORDA was just the administrator. Pataki had to specifically earmark money for the expansion of Gore or it would have been lost in Lake Placid. |
But the new head of ORDA is a Gore guy, the ORDA board has people from NC. This just doesn't make sense.
Don't ski the trees, ski the spaces between the trees.
|
Um, yeah.
Administrator? What's that? Dude, it's all about budgets. He who controls the pursestrings has the power.
funny like a clown
|
In reply to this post by x10003q
Oh, dude, there's plenty of ski areas that existed in the 60s that don't anymore. If it wasn't for the taxpayers of the state of NY, doubtful Gore or, certainly Bellayre, would today. Get real. ORDA is poorly managed workfare charity for both the ADK and the Catskills, which is ok, I'm cool with the workfare part, as long as I don't show up on a weekday and nothing is running and somebody tells me that, sorry, they're understaffed. I mean, stop thinking of yourselves, lame-o state employees called managers, and start running this thing like a business with unlimited funds. Anyway, you're being awfully naive that Gore is somehow a neglected black child within ORDA that would even exist on it's own. Please.
funny like a clown
|
So who takes responsibility for Gore not increasing its skier visits after the huge increase in size, snowmaking, lifts, facilities? NYS has invested millions of $$$$$ into Gore, yet it is still drawing around 215K. ORDA is tasked to improve the local economy and that includes North Creek. The entire ORDA board should be replaced. The numbers tell the truth.
Gore Season Skier Visits 2000 - 2001 185,900 2001 - 2002 173,530 2002 - 2003 213,929 2003 - 2004 215,707 2004 – 2005 212,703 2005 – 2006 207,299 2006 – 2007 209,353 2007 – 2008 238,467 2008 – 2009 230,791 2009 – 2010 218,166 2010 – 2011 217,032 2011 – 2012 (not reported) 2012 – 2013 (not reported) 2013 – 2014 241,452 2014 – 2015 237,032 2015 – 2016 160,484 2016 – 2017 211,487 2017 – 2018 212,387 |
Administrator
|
The buck stops here.
"You just need to go at that shit wide open, hang on, and own it." —Camp
|
In reply to this post by Benny Profane
I think that statement is somewhat true, in the sense that if you assume that ADK Park restrictions remained in place, and Gore did not get any NYS money, would Gore be what it is today. Almost certainly not. But if you take away the park restrictions on development, and have a private company willing to invest in better snowmaking coverage, marketing and on-mountain development, I think the physical attributes of Gore and the ease of access from NY metro would make it a killer location for a ski resort. Having finished 4 years as a season passholder, I came to accept that the things that limit Gore are the same thing that make it a special place. No on-mountain development despite big mountain feel, an uncrowded feeling on parts of the mountain even when the cars are parked down the mountain road, and the general lack of the types of consumerist rich folk that I am trying to get away from in the first place. Petronio |
True. That's it for me. I was told about Gore when I complained of the crowds in Vermont on Saturdays, and it proved to be a better alternative, plus it was a half hour closer than Killington from Saratoga, where I lived. No condos, dead town, I assume most of the second homes are winterfied Lake George stuff. Worked for me, except for the shorter season and lower elevation. It would be a shame if they screwed up the park views with condo towns.
I've been thinking lately that the whole argument about development is almost moot now, in the winter of baby boomdom. There really isn't much demand for Eastern ski real estate these days, it's been dying for years, along with the generation that started it dying. Cheap air fare is killing that market, too, just like it killed 50s Catskills for Florida. And, even though the west is a healthier market (hell, I can't afford it out there, but I can get a ski in and out condo at Pico for less than a lot of cars) when's the last time you've heard if a new resort opening or a lot of development outside of the .1% billionaire market out there? Skiing is shrinking. It's a limited market that's saturated. I've been going to Killington for thirty years, and in the last five to ten I've been driving by more and more derelict motels and buildings on 4 and even the access road. Nobody wants them. So, be happy the taxpayer keeps ORDA running.
funny like a clown
|
If so, then what will slopeside communities look like 20 years from now?
Pretty lil meth towns or will ski bumming make a comeback? |
I read an article last week about the incredibly shrinking golf market, which is similar in time frame and demographic. Remember when golf courses were going to save ski resorts with summer income? Now theres hundreds of communities around the country that were built all around courses, which, of course, are really expensive to create and maintain, and the golf courses have shut down or are hurting, big time, so they jack up the membership fees to survive (you know, like 200 dollar plus lift tickets we see today). And kids dont care, or can't afford the money or time, just like skiing. They have debt from school and lousy jobs.
So, yeah, maybe they will turn into meth mills. But maybe they'll just be abandoned, neglected, because its too hard to live there. Although, if you want to experience a place that's creepy and underpopulated, check out that new vilage at Stowe midweek. Where is everybody.
funny like a clown
|
In reply to this post by x10003q
OK - but your thesis was that ORDA favored Lake Placid over the other venues. If anything ORDA has been doing everything it can within the budget given to them by the state and the money made at the venues to keep these numbers from falling. They certainly have turned the decline in skier visits to Bell around, yet you dismiss that fact. They (or the state) has poured a lot of money into Gore and Bell over the past 5 years yet you dismiss that fact. They may poorly manage projects, fight ageing infrastructure issues and the like but they are throwing money at these venues. What I find fascinating in this thread is that several years ago there was a little snot nosed kid who came in bitching wildly about how F'd up ORDA was - "If you can't blow it don't cut it", "The mountain should be 100% open by Christmas", "High speed bubble quads everywhere" and this crowd beat the war drums and just about ran this "radical" out of town. Now see where we are...
Don't ski the trees, ski the spaces between the trees.
|
Administrator
|
In reply to this post by Benny Profane
While skiing definitely has demographic issues, I think golf is in bigger trouble.
Regarding Gore numbers, how do they compare to the industry as a whole, and other mountains in the Northeast? EDIT: I found this...
"You just need to go at that shit wide open, hang on, and own it." —Camp
|
i find it interesting that some of the biggest years , where during the "Great Recession"..
"Peace and Love"
|
Administrator
|
Probably more tied to weather than anything else. The impact of the recession could be less destination trips, back then.
"You just need to go at that shit wide open, hang on, and own it." —Camp
|
In reply to this post by Benny Profane
Here's the rub:
The average walk-up lift ticket in the US is $123 for an adult right now. Gore charges $88 on a weekend. If you want improved facilities and a more consistant experience like the kind you might find at say Mt. Snow, Okemo, or Stratton, expect to pay a lot more than $88/day for it. So pick your poison here: Second class mountain with (relatively) cheap day tickets or First class with much more expensive tickets. |
Administrator
|
And longer lift lines and greater skier density. About ten years ago I asked Mike Pratt what percentage of ticket revenue is passholder vs day ticket for Gore. He told me that it was around 20% for passholders. Obvi could be different now, but I'd guess that day ticket price is still pretty important.
"You just need to go at that shit wide open, hang on, and own it." —Camp
|
In reply to this post by Harvey
I think it was the skiing demographic cutting back for a few years on big trips for the family, like everyone else, because those were scary times. They stayed close to home. I think Vermont was up, too. But, when the dust started to settle and they realized that they were going to be saved by the bailout, as their house values at least didnt drop, sometimes went up, and their jobs were safe, they were right back on the upper middle class party train, with the lowest interest rates in decades. I'll admit that when that financial crash happened, I thought, awesome, perfect timing, because I was retiring, and I could grab a cheap condo out west at a nice discount. Nope, the opposite happened. If there's any market that proves that there was an unequeal recovery in this country, it's the western ski housing market. The top ten percent are doing well.
funny like a clown
|
In reply to this post by St. Jerry
I'll take 2nd class, low key, rustic all day!
I don't rip, I bomb.
|
In reply to this post by Benny Profane
As a thirty-something millennial living in Brooklyn with a bunch of other millennials I can confirm this. No one skis, and the few that do ski, go for one or two weekends a year to Vermont. They certainly aren't buying vacation homes in ski country. Even as someone who does ski 30+ days a season the math of owning a vacation home makes it tough to justify the hassle of it. Gore's biggest issue IMHO is the lack of lodging. If you're not a local day tripper from the capital region there just aren't that many options, especially nice enough options to justify going to Gore over VT for the masses who don't care how many glades the mountain has. The Copperfield charges $200+ a night and doesn't even have a hot tub. You want to fix ORDA? You need to increase skier visits to make Gore a 7 day a week resort to justify the expense. To get NYS to allow development of hotels in the surrounding area you need the skier visits to justify it. But given the demographic shifts and future climate change I can't see that being a smart investment long term. The development you need to fix Gore is just never going to happen. As others have said Gore is great for what it is. If you want a well run 7 day a week mountain and long lift lines go to VT. |