Harvey wrote
Still don't understand why places like Florida aren't acting. When you look at the state by state data, it sure looks like the distancing is having a positive effect.
Yes a positive effect for reducing cases/death but a huge negative effect on the economy. What's the best balance point? Beats me. At this point in time we've had less deaths from CV in a month (~5,100) than this country has every day (~7,000) for various reasons.
I talked to my daughter today and asked her just who exactly is sick and dying in this whole thing (she's an RN in a hospital in NJ). All the vents are being used and 90+% of patients are elderly...most from nursing homes. Made sense but it's a small sample so I looked for something bigger and found Italy's results. Here's what they are reporting:
Death from CV by age group - Italy
90+ 6%
80-90 42%
70-80 35%
60-70 16%
<60 1%
So
if you get the virus then these are your odds if the distribution holds true for the US. Even that is misleading because a 30 y.o. doesn't have a 1% chance of dying...it's fairly linear with age. Might it not make more sense to "lock down"/protect our elderly population and make that a priority instead of locking down a nation of healthy, productive young people? At some point some natural immunity would help. Hell, I'm guessing that most of us here on this forum even at our age (I'm 58) are a lot healthier than most people half our age. I know that in NYS the public officials are very careful not to reveal the details behind the deaths. Why?